Tag Archive for ed rendell

Actually, Council DOES Want To Hear From You…sorta

Yesterday, I wrote about Harrisburg City Council’s latest Resolution – 31-2010 – which is basically a hodgepodge of new rules for city council meetings. It’s a housekeeping measure that happens every so often to keep things current.

What I reported and reacted to was this brief paragraph that was posted on PennLive -

Harrisburg City Council voted unanimously Tuesday night to eliminate the public comment at the end of its meetings and allow people only to speak on city business at the beginning. Comments would be limited to three minutes and must be focused on agenda items before council that evening.

The way that reads (and the way that the Patriot reported it) sounds like comments at Council Meetings are limited to ONLY business listed on the agenda. “Comments would be limited to three minutes and must be focused on agenda items before council that evening.”

But after speaking with councilman Brad Koplinski before last night’s Rendall pep-talk, I gained some clarity on what is ACTUALLY happening with the new rules in Council Chambers.

The way the Resolution is worded does allow constituents to speak before council on ANY topic they wish, not just topics on the agenda. And had the Patriot News reporter done his job and reported accurately, there probably wouldn’t have been as much blowback on this- here it is, word for word:

COURTESY OF THE FLOOR
RULE NO. 9
Courtesy of the Floor is the order of business during which residents or taxpayers of the city of Harrisburg may address Council on any matter of concern, official action or deliberation which is or may be before City Council, prior to taking action. A sign-in sheet shall be prominently displayed, and all persons wishing to address Council must print their name, address and telephone number or e-mail address. The President shall set guidelines for such courtesy and has the option of establishing time limits consistent with the number of people who will address the members.

So there it is. It’s not, as the Patriot reported, that council has voted to “limit” public comment….it has voted to merely move public comment from the end of the meeting to the beginning of the meeting.

Furthermore, what citizens and taxpayers may speak about is not limited to agenda items, as clearly dictated in the following sentence from the new Resolution: “Courtesy of the Floor is the order of business during which residents or taxpayers of the city of Harrisburg may address Council on any matter of concern, official action or deliberation which is or may be before City Council, prior to taking action”

So there you have it. We CAN still speak before council on ANY topic that we see fit – but it has to be done at the BEGINNING of the meeting.

Which, in my opinion, is better anyway because now we don’t need to sit through the entire meetings to speak to council about bankruptcy or the Amusement Tax or potholes or prostitutes or dog fighting or whatever other ailments we feel the council needs to hear about.

So, thanks Brad “Cufflinks” Koplinski for clearing that up.

Martial Law Means They Win

Is Stan Lawson out of his fucking mind?

I’m serious.

Earlier today, Stanley Lawson, president of the Harrisburg chapter of the NAACP urged the imposition of martial law for thirty days in the city of Harrisburg to help stop the recent string of gunplay in our streets.

Clearly, there is a problem facing our city. But it’s not just this city…it’s nation wide.

And Stan Lawson wants to take away the civil liberties of law abiding, tax paying, society-contributing citizens in order to restore safety to the poorest of neighborhoods?

Additionally, Lawson urged Governor Rendell to bring in the National Guard and impose a curfew in the city.

Which means that you and I and everyone else who participates in neighborhood clean ups, pays mortgages, takes care of our homes, patronize local businesses and raise families would have to be in our homes by a predetermined time nightly and pass M-16 wielding, Hummer driving soldiers.

Again- I ask- is Stan Lawson out of his fucking mind?

The violence in this city has increased of late- but we’re not at a critical mass. I don’t fear leaving my house. It’s 1:07AM right now and I just walked a few blocks without any worry of being shot or mugged. The people who are shooting each other aren’t killing and shooting at random.

And unless the majority of the 47,000 (and falling) residents of the city of Harrisburg suddenly get involved in the drug trade, we don’t have much to worry about either.

But Stan Lawson wants to take away our liberties to make the streets safer?

No thanks, Mr Lawson.

Step away from that microphone, sir. You’re only making things worse.