Actually, Council DOES Want To Hear From You…sorta
Yesterday, I wrote about Harrisburg City Council’s latest Resolution – 31-2010 – which is basically a hodgepodge of new rules for city council meetings. It’s a housekeeping measure that happens every so often to keep things current.
What I reported and reacted to was this brief paragraph that was posted on PennLive -
Harrisburg City Council voted unanimously Tuesday night to eliminate the public comment at the end of its meetings and allow people only to speak on city business at the beginning. Comments would be limited to three minutes and must be focused on agenda items before council that evening.
The way that reads (and the way that the Patriot reported it) sounds like comments at Council Meetings are limited to ONLY business listed on the agenda. “Comments would be limited to three minutes and must be focused on agenda items before council that evening.”
But after speaking with councilman Brad Koplinski before last night’s Rendall pep-talk, I gained some clarity on what is ACTUALLY happening with the new rules in Council Chambers.
The way the Resolution is worded does allow constituents to speak before council on ANY topic they wish, not just topics on the agenda. And had the Patriot News reporter done his job and reported accurately, there probably wouldn’t have been as much blowback on this- here it is, word for word:
COURTESY OF THE FLOOR
RULE NO. 9 Courtesy of the Floor is the order of business during which residents or taxpayers of the city of Harrisburg may address Council on any matter of concern, official action or deliberation which is or may be before City Council, prior to taking action. A sign-in sheet shall be prominently displayed, and all persons wishing to address Council must print their name, address and telephone number or e-mail address. The President shall set guidelines for such courtesy and has the option of establishing time limits consistent with the number of people who will address the members.
So there it is. It’s not, as the Patriot reported, that council has voted to “limit” public comment….it has voted to merely move public comment from the end of the meeting to the beginning of the meeting.
Furthermore, what citizens and taxpayers may speak about is not limited to agenda items, as clearly dictated in the following sentence from the new Resolution: “Courtesy of the Floor is the order of business during which residents or taxpayers of the city of Harrisburg may address Council on any matter of concern, official action or deliberation which is or may be before City Council, prior to taking action”
So there you have it. We CAN still speak before council on ANY topic that we see fit – but it has to be done at the BEGINNING of the meeting.
Which, in my opinion, is better anyway because now we don’t need to sit through the entire meetings to speak to council about bankruptcy or the Amusement Tax or potholes or prostitutes or dog fighting or whatever other ailments we feel the council needs to hear about.
So, thanks Brad “Cufflinks” Koplinski for clearing that up.
Hmmm,
Well… it’s a common procedure that the city has adopted… not sure it is the best.
State law on this requires comment. Most municipalities have before and after—- but plenty just do the one or the other.
I’m not so sure about your ‘still can speak on anything comment’. The final modifier of your high-lighted bit says, “prior to taking action”. Logically… you CAN speak on ANYTHING (which the council is contemplating taking action on) PRIOR to them taking the action. But… if they are not contemplating it (and it’s hard to know what they are really contemplating other than the offical agenda unless they convey that in some other manner)…. then you don’t have a right to comment.
Kinda, sorta make any sense?
I’m not so sure this is just a change in the time of comments. (Does it mirror prior language?)
For the record… I favor 2 comment periods…. one on agenda items (prior to the meeting)… one for ‘reactions’ (and/or ‘everything else)(after the meeting.
Just my take.